Archive for the 'Avoiding Probate' Category

At what age should I consider setting up a Living Trust?

Monday, November 19th, 2007

Age is generally not a primary factor in determining whether one needs a Living Trust.

While it is obvious that an older person or couple (with a statistically shorter remaining life expectancy) needs Estate Planning, it is also appropriate for families to set up a Living Trust while their children are very young. For them, a Living Trust is the best way to ensure a safe supply of money for the support, maintenance and education of their children in case the parents die.

In fact, for families with minor children, a Living Trust makes an excellent beneficiary for Life Insurance and retirement plans when you want the proceeds to be held for your children and used for their support without a formal court supervised financial guardianship. With a Living Trust, there is much more flexibility, control, cost savings, and the final distribution to your children can be delayed until they reach an appropriate age.

In any event, procrastination is dangerous. I’ve had far too many calls from adult children whose parents are incapacitated (recent stroke, etc.) who want to know if we can now prepare a Living Trust. “I’m sorry,” I must reply, “it’s just too late…”

Should I tell the kids about my estate plan?

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

I usually recommend that my clients tell their family about the details of their Estate Plan. This is true in the case of a child who for whatever reason may feel shorted as compared to his or her siblings, or even a child who is disinherited.

I find that this open and frank discussion with one’s family often quells suspicion, and give the children an opportunity to ask questions. I find that most Estate Contests, or at least bad feelings even when no legal action is initiated, are the result of anger after a parent dies. For example, a disinherited child who didn’t not know that he or she is to be disinherited may be angry at the parent, but since the parent is then deceased, he or she takes out the anger on his or her siblings in the form of a Will Contest. The problem is even if the other siblings prevail, as they usually will when the estate plan is properly prepared and executed by a qualified attorney, the financial and emotional costs are still very high for the family. If a disinherited child has an opportunity to express his or her anger to the parent for being disinherited, while in the short term it can of course be unpleasant, in the long term the family is often better off.

So….at Thanksgiving this year will you be talking about your desires regarding funeral and burial?

By the way, for a video and transcript of Warren Buffet’s testimony to congress about Estate Taxes click here.
-Ken

Amending a Living Trust

Tuesday, November 13th, 2007

To make changes to a Living Trust you generally need to execute an Amendment (which is like a Codicil to a Will). Note that changes which require an Amendment are things such as changing the successor trustee, changing the distribution plan, or changing certain tax clauses. Transferring assets in and out of a trust is not an Amendment, but rather is known as Trust Funding.

A Trust Amendment should be prepared and executed with the same formality as the original Living Trust. It is not something most people should attempt to tackle on their own. Most importantly, do not try to amend your Living Trust by crossing out lines or making changes to the original document. Your original trust was notarized and presumably executed with many formalities, all supervised by the drafting attorney. Writing on the trust document after it was signed and notarized simply leads to an obvious problem: The handwritten changes and cross-outs were not notarized. So as a general rule, Do Not Write on Your Original Trust or Will!
You do not need to return to the drafting attorney to amend a Living Trust. Any qualified Trusts & Estates attorney can handle it for you.

In some instances an attorney may recommend an Amended & Restated Trust. In this case the entire trust is re-written, but the name of the trust remains the same. In effect you are amending the entire trust. This allows a major revision of the Living Trust without the needing to re-title assets currently in the trust.

In short, amending a Living Trust is as important as the drafting of the original document. As always, be careful!

-Ken

How to Name Beneficiaries

Thursday, November 8th, 2007

Any time you’ve filled out paperwork for a retirement account, annuity, or life insurance policy, you named a beneficiary. You can also name beneficiaries on bank accounts, and many investment accounts. The beneficiary is the person, people, or entity who will receive the account or policy in case of your death. Filling out the blanks on these forms may seem simple. However, the way you complete these forms can have significant tax and estate planning consequences.

Beneficiary Designation Trumps a Will. A beneficiary will receive the account or policy outright at your death. It is important to note that the beneficiary designation overrides anything that you may have written in a Will. For example, you may name one child as a beneficiary with instructions in a Will to share those funds among siblings. The instructions in the Will in this example have no effect; the child named as beneficiary is the 100% new owner of the account.

Minor Children. Another pitfall is naming minor children as beneficiaries. Someone under 18 (in California) cannot receive the funds outright. Instead, the money will end up in a potentially costly court guardianship proceeding. Consider naming a trust instead.

Name an Alternate Beneficiary. Be sure you name both a primary and contingent (alternate) beneficiary. The contingent beneficiary receives the money in the event the primary beneficiary predeceases you. I have had many instances where the primary beneficiary is deceased and we are forced to probate the account simply because there is no living named beneficiary.

Living Trust as Beneficiary? Be careful naming a living trust as a beneficiary. There are many instances where naming a trust is appropriate, such as a case where there are minor children or a disabled beneficiary. However, in many instances there are tax advantages of naming humans (as opposed to a trust) as beneficiary. This topic is complex, and you are urged to consult your tax adviser or estate planning attorney if you have questions.

A Big Mistake. Be cautious naming different beneficiaries of different accounts. I once had a situation where a mother named each of her three children as beneficiary of three different large accounts. Eventually the mother became incapacitated and needed assistance from a part time caregiver. The children (who did not get along) began to fight about “whose account” should pay for the costs. It was a sad an unfortunate situation that could have been easily avoided.

The basic message here is BE CAREFUL. Talk to your estate planning, financial and tax advisers about your beneficiary designations. A mistake can be costly.

-Ken

Advantages of a Living Trust

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

The first question I get from many clients is, “Which is best for me, a Will or a Living Trust?” There is no quick and easy answer to that questions, but I can offer some general advice.

In California an estate usually must go through probate when the estate value exceeds $100,000 in market value (not equity value). Probate is the court process to administer an estate with or without a Will. In other words, having a Will does not avoid probate, in fact, it generally guarantees probate. Probate is something most families want to avoid. It is very costly, takes many months to over a year, can be required in multiple states, and is generally a hassle for everyone.

There are many ways to avoid probate. Account beneficiary designations (TOD or POD accounts) and Joint Tenancy are two of the most common. However, each of these also has a downside in many cases. There are of course situations where these methods work, but in many instances problems occur.

This leads us to the best way to avoid probate for most clients: The Living Trust. A Living Trust not only avoids probate, it is usually the quicker, easier, cheaper, and most hassle-free way to administer an estate. For married couples it can minimize or completely avoid Estate Taxes. It handles situations where someone becomes incapacitated. In many cases it is more likely to achieve one’s wishes regarding estate distribution than other alternatives.

In short, for most Californians who have an estate with a market value over one hundred thousand dollars (meaning just about anyone owning real estate), a Living Trust is the preferred estate planning document. To read more about Living Trusts on my website click here.

-Ken